The
scriptures referred to are Genesis 18:20-32 and Luke 11:1-13.
It's
a good thing we don't live in a world of superpowered or magical
humans.
As Lord Acton wrote, “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts
absolutely.” If you can do anything, what keeps you from actually
doing it? What keeps Superman from becoming a tyrant? In the comics
Lex Luthor's opposition to Superman is that doesn't trust someone
that powerful. Lex is a genius, though, and knows better than to,
say, kill Lois Lane. The Joker does not and in an alternate reality,
he kills Lois, her and Clark's unborn child and wipes out the city of
Metropolis with a nuclear bomb. Then Superman does what Batman never
could: he punches his fist clean through the Joker's torso. Gotta say
it, though: the Joker totally deserved it.
A
human being so powerful that he is essentially a living weapon would
be a nightmare, as the recent “Superboy as monster” film
Brightburn
illustrates. And yet we love the idea of supermen protecting us, and, lacking real superheroes, we tend to give lots of power to people we perceive as strong. Italy
and Germany were both in bad shape in the years after the first World
War and the Great Depression so they chose "strong men" leaders like
Mussolini and Hitler. Stalin ruled Russia with an iron fist and
nationalist and military leaders pushed imperial Japan from democracy
into totalitarianism. It doesn't take an historian to see how a world
ruled by "strong men" who put national interests above everything else
would result in war and genocide in the first half of the 20th
century. Some see the rise of "strong men" leaders today as equally
ominous. What nobody seems to realize is that real strength is seen
in restraint. The person who cannot control himself is weak.
The
usual take on God in the Old Testament is that he loves going all
wrathful on sinners. And yet, in the story of Abraham, the father of
our faith, there are some notable instances that go against that
concept of God. One is the sacrifice of Isaac. In a world where
people did not question sacrificing humans and even their own
children to their gods, Yahweh illustrates his uniqueness with
regards to this practice via an enacted parable. God stops Abraham
from sacrificing Isaac. And then God provides the sacrifice himself,
something he will do even more powerfully in his son Jesus.
Another
instance where we see the supposedly wrath-happy God of the Old
Testament differently is in today's lesson from Genesis. God appears
to Abraham as 3 men, which is interesting in the light of the New
Testament data that led to the doctrine of the Trinity. Two go to
Sodom to check out its reputation for sin. God tells Abraham that he
needs to see if they are as wicked as it has been reported. “If
not, I want to know.” (Genesis 18:21, NET)
Notice
that this suggests that God hopes the outcry about Sodom is untrue.
That's what he wants to know. He has not yet judged the city. God
wants to be merciful. And Abraham seems to pick up on that.
Not
that God has said what he will actually do if he finds out that Sodom
is very wicked. That too Abraham intuits. God is just. He will not
turn a blind eye to sin when he finds it. But he wants to see the
evidence. Now we don't know what Abraham has heard about Sodom, but
his nephew Lot lives there and so he probably knows a lot. But he
doesn't have a God's eye view of the extent of the city's wickedness.
So, for the sake of this story at least, it appears that God and
Abraham are working without the full facts.
And
Abraham brings up a pertinent point. Even if God finds a great deal
of wickedness in Sodom, there is no way that absolutely everyone is
totally evil. So will God wipe out everyone, good and bad? There
might be as many as 50 righteous folks living in that place. Should
they perish as well?
“And
the Lord said, 'If I find at Sodom fifty righteous in the city, I
will forgive the whole place for their sake.'” The Hebrew word the
NRSV translates as “forgive” is an interesting one. It literally
means “to lift, to carry, to take.” It is most often translated
“to bear.” What God is saying is he will bear with or carry the
burden of the many wicked people for the sake of the 50 righteous
ones.
What
follows is Abraham showing a lot of chutzpah haggling with God over
the fate of Sodom. What if Sodom is 5 short of 50 righteous folks?
“Will you destroy the whole city for lack of 5?” “I will not
destroy it,” says God. But Abraham, knowing he is but dust before
the creator of the universe, keeps asking about lower numbers of good
people. What about 40? How about 30? What if it's only 20? Maybe we
are only talking about 10. What then? “For the sake of ten I will
not destroy it,” says God.
Abraham
knows that God is just but also that he is merciful. He has bought
Sodom a great deal of leeway. They only need to have 10 righteous
people in the whole place. Well, we know how that turns out. Only 3
people make it out alive, and they aren't exactly saints.
By
the way, Genesis doesn't tell us what the sins of Sodom are. A lot of
people think it is homosexuality but that's based on just one
incident. The visiting angels were going to sleep in the town square
until Lot persistently urges them to stay with him. And that night
the men of the city besiege the house, asking that the visitors be
sent out to them. The key word in the interchange that follows is
that the men of the city want to “know” the visitors. The
implication is that they mean this in the same way a pick up artist
does when he tells a woman he'd like to get to know her. So this
story is usually seen as showing that the men of Sodom want to rape
the angels. And Lot offers his virgin daughters in exchange!
There
is an alternate interpretation, according to the NIV
Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible.
The men of the city might be suspicious of the visitors and want to
know them in the sense of interrogate them and see if they are spies.
Lot resists this idea because he knows that the interrogation will be
rather unpleasant. (This is the Ancient Near East, after all.) And so
he offers his daughters as hostages to be held as a guarantee that
his visitors will not do anything bad. Still most commentators do not
favor this interpretation.
Either
way this is a gross violation of the Middle Eastern rules of
hospitality on the part of the men of the city. So much so that Lot
would rather surrender his daughters than betray his duty as host. By
the way, Lot's gesture is one the original audience of this story would
find equally repugnant, as seen in the similarly horrifying story
found in Judges 19. Remember this is a culture where rape gets you
stoned to death.
It's
pretty obvious that Sodom is a very wicked place but it is not in
Genesis that we are told precisely what their sins were. In Ezekiel
it says, “Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: she and her
daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help
the poor and needy.” (Ezekiel 16:49) Having an abundance of food
but a contemptuous indifference to the plight of those in need is why
God condemned them. And their well-known mistreatment of the poor is
probably why Lot didn't want the visitors sleeping in the town
square. They would be easy targets for men who had no regard for the
rights of homeless strangers.
Besides
telling us how God feels about arrogant people who abuse and exploit
the poor, what else do we learn about him, especially from the
passage in Genesis?
For
one thing, if a disaster comes from God, he will disclose it
beforehand. Just prior to where our passage begins, we are told,
“Then the Lord said, 'Should I hide from Abraham what I am about to
do? After all, Abraham will surely become a great and powerful
nation, and all the nations on the earth will pronounce blessings on
one another using his name. I have chosen him so that he may command
his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Lord
by doing what is right and just. Then the Lord will give to Abraham
what he promised him.'” (Genesis 18:17-19) God decides to tell
Abraham in order to illustrate his ways to him and that it is vital
that we follow his commands.
Why
is this important? There are a lot of preachers who assign divine
reasons to disasters, saying that this state or this city was hit by
some natural phenomenon due to some action they took, which the
preacher deemed sinful. But this story and the record of how prophets work
in the Bible show that God would announce it beforehand, not after
the fact. Preachers who only afterwards say a calamity was God's
wrath are just declaring their own personal opinions. And both the
book of Job and Jesus say that tragedies do not indicate that the
victims were sinful, nor that they were more sinful than the average
person. (Luke 13:4-5, John 9:1-3)
Secondly,
God does not act on impulse. Again I think what we have here is an
enacted parable. Does God really need to send angels to find out
things for him? No. He is giving Abraham a glimpse into how he
thinks. He is illustrating that he doesn't act in a knee-jerk fashion
but with deliberation. He looks at the evidence. Which we should do
as well, especially when we are judging the actions of others. Jesus
said we should not pass judgment on people themselves. (Matthew
7:1-2) Only God is qualified for that. But we obviously can judge
whether actions are moral or immoral, wise or foolish. And we should
only do so based on evidence. Furthermore, we should do it with
an eye to helping the person change his mind. (Matthew 18:15-17) That
is literally the whole point of the book of Jonah. As it says in
Ezekiel, “For I take no delight in the death of anyone, declares
the sovereign Lord. Repent and live!” (Ezekiel 18:32, NET) God
wants to forgive, not condemn. And he weighs the evidence before he
acts, so that his judgment is true.
Thirdly,
it is OK to question God. He will listen. He is reasonable. He will
not change his mind about sin but may change his response, the way a
parent will take into account whether a child understands and is
sorry about hitting her brother or not. Returning to the book of
Jonah, that is the prophet's problem with God: “O Lord, is this not
what I said when I was still at home? That is why I was so quick to
flee to Tarshish. I knew that you were a gracious and compassionate
God, slow to anger and abounding in love, a God who relents from
sending calamity.” (Jonah 4:2) Far from thinking God cannot wait to
roast sinners, Jonah's beef is that God is too forgiving.
And
finally from our passage in Genesis we see that we can intercede for
others with God. We can advocate for them. We can pray that he shows
them mercy. Indeed in our gospel passage, notice that in Luke's
version of the Lord's Prayer it says, “And forgive us our sins, for
we ourselves forgive everyone indebted to us.” It is an
acknowledgment that if we expect God to act in a forgiving way
towards us we need to act in a forgiving way towards others. Jesus
reinforced this in his parable of the merciless servant, who is
forgiven a ridiculously large debt by his master but doesn't do the
same to a fellow servant. In the end, the master treats the servant
as he treated his coworker. (Matthew 18:23-35) Again the goal of
Christianity is to become like Jesus, who forgave even those who
arrested and crucified him. (Luke 22:49-51; 23:34)
Nobody
wants a world where there are no rules for how to treat other people
but no sensible person wants a world where there is no mercy for
anyone who breaks the rules. We all fall short of what God expects us
to be. We can be grateful that we have a God who is both just and
forgiving. We also should emulate him. We need to pray for wisdom so
we will know how and when to balance justice with mercy.
Sodom
is a cautionary tale. It shows that God is not on the side of the
bullies, the arrogant, the abusers, nor those who are complacent, who
ignore the needs of the poor, the safety of the stranger, or the victims
of injustice. They will pay, if not in this life. If you wonder why
God doesn't rain down wrath on modern communities that reflect the
callousness and indifference to suffering we see in Sodom, consider
Jesus' parable of the wheat and the weeds. When a farmer awakens one
day to find weeds growing up among his wheat, he is urged to pull out
the weeds. “But he said, 'No, since in gathering the weeds you may
uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest.
At harvest time I will tell the reapers, “First collect the weeds
and tie them in bundles to be burned, but then gather the wheat into
my barn.”” (Matthew 13:24-30) Our lives are so intertwined that
extricating relatively bad people (fathers, mothers, sons, daughters,
etc) could cause or exacerbate trauma in the lives of those who love
them but are relatively good. It seems that Abraham realized this and
Jesus articulated it by saying, “love your enemy and pray for those
who persecute you, so that you may be like your Father in heaven...”
(Matthew 5:44-45)
And
if Sodom gives us an example of what to avoid, this story of Abraham
gives us an example we should imitate. Abraham is more concerned with
the welfare of the innocent than in ruthlessly punishing the guilty. He is
persistent in his prayerful conversation with God, as the man at
midnight is with the friend who is in bed. We cannot be afraid to ask
God for what we or others lack, to search for what is necessary to
make things better, to knock on doors and seek help. God will give
us, not necessarily all we desire, but what we need. And what we
principally need is the Holy Spirit of the God who is love, the
Spirit of truth, the Comforter, the Encourager, the Advocate. It
seems we have a dearth of those qualities in this world.
Jesus
said, “You are the salt of the earth.” (Matthew 5:13) Salt at that time was the only preservative, the only thing that kept food
from going bad. Jesus is saying we are like the 10 righteous who, had
they existed, would have saved Sodom. Jesus said, “You are the
light of the world.” (Matthew 5:14) Light reveals hidden hazards
and leads people out of darkness. Our roles in this world are to
preserve what is good and enlighten the spiritually and morally
blind. Nowhere in scripture, not even in the book of Revelation, are
Christians to be instruments of judgment and punishment. Only one
wiser and more holy than we is qualified for that. And he is inclined
to be merciful if at all possible.
God
gave us a world of good gifts: water, food, life, and all our various
qualities that enable us to affect the world. We can use them as God
intended and help one another or we can choose to pervert their
purposes and use them to harm others. We can use our intelligence,
our communication skills, our sense of community and our collective
strengths to make the world a better place or a worse one. We can
cheer on its destruction or work for its redemption. We know which
side Abraham and Jesus are on. Which side are you on?
No comments:
Post a Comment