The
scriptures referred to Acts 9:1-20 and John 21:1-19.
We've
all had experiences we wish would never end. They were moments when
all seemed right with the world and we never wanted it to change. We
wish we could pause it like a video, or barring that, fade out like
the perfect movie ending. But time doesn't stop. Everything changes.
We get older. Things fall apart. Nothing stands still. As the ancient
Greek philosopher Heraclitus observed, the only constant is change.
So the question is whether it is a change for the better or the
worse.
I
used to be effortlessly slim. I was naturally thin and if I gained a
few pounds, I could just skip a meal and lose the weight. My wife
hated me for that. Not anymore. Like most people, as I got older, I got heavier. Now to lose weight I have to do like
everyone else: eat less, especially less sweet, salty, fatty things,
and exercise more. If I cheat, I gain weight overnight. There's no
magic pill or cure. You just have to keep working at it.
Left
to themselves things get worse. They decline, fall apart, or get
wrecked. That's true of cars, houses, relationships and people. To
keep things functional requires constant maintenance and the
readiness to repair or upgrade as needed. Sometimes, however, major
renovation is necessary. And that can be painful. Which is why we
avoid it.
And
that's just with inanimate things. When it comes to our relationships or
ourselves, we avoid major changes like the plague. Weirdly, though,
we act this way even if we are unhappy with a relationship or
ourselves. As bad as they may be, they are familiar. Change is not
only painful, it can be scary precisely because the results of that
change, and where we will find ourselves afterward, are unfamiliar. A
lot of people don't leave an abusive partner because of fear of what
will happen. Where will they go? How will they manage on less money?
What about the kids if they are any? Better to stay with a miserable
certainty than to venture out into a future that is both unfamiliar
and uncertain.
The
same thing applies to people who live in an unstable or violent
country. Things have to get extremely painful and scary for them to
leave home, family, friends, their language and culture to try to
find a better life in another country. Refugees are very brave and
resourceful people. Accepting them is getting an extremely valuable
infusion of what made this country great. Albert Einstein fled the
Nazis as did the family of former Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright; Gloria Estefan's family fled Castro; Mikhail Baryshnikov
fled Russia. Our country has been enriched by refugees and their
children like Elie Wiesel, Nadia Comaneci, Thich Nhat Hanh, Mila
Kunis, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Google co-founder Sergey Brin and the
Von Trapp family.
At
age two, Jesus and his family fled from Bethlehem in Judea to Egypt
to escape the murderous King Herod the Great. Later they moved to
Nazareth in Galilee, making Jesus the new kid in town at least twice
in his early life. So he knew the pain of dealing with major changes
in your life even before he began his ministry. And the reason he ran
into opposition was because of the changes he was proposing. As we said, changes in your relationships or yourself
are the most painful ones to make. Yet that is exactly what
Christianity is about: changing relationships and changing people.
In
Acts we see one of the most dramatic turnarounds in someone's life
imaginable. Saul was, in his own words, “circumcised on the eighth
day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of
Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting
the church; as for legalistic righteousness, faultless.”
(Philippians 3:5-6) His religion was his life and he was so invested
in it he was willing to go after those he thought were perverting it.
In fact he was willing to go all the way to Damascus, 135 miles from
Jerusalem, in order
to keep this Jesus heresy from spreading to the estimated 10 to 18
thousand Jews living there. He also may have been going to apprehend
Christians who had fled after the stoning of Stephen to bring them
back to Jerusalem for trial before the Sanhedrin. (Acts 8:1) Saul
went to the high priest because, though at the time the high priest
no longer had jurisdiction over Jews in that area, any letters of
introduction from him would see to it that Saul was taken seriously by the
Jewish community in Damascus.
So
after traveling for maybe 6 days on foot, Saul is within sight of
Damascus when he is dazzled by a light he describes elsewhere as
“brighter than the sun.” (Acts 26:13) Saul falls to the ground
and hears a voice say, in Aramaic, “Saul, Saul, why do you
persecute me?” (cf. Acts 26:14) He answers, “Who are you, Lord?”
and while “Lord” at that time could be the equivalent of “Sir,”
given the circumstances, it looks like he really thinks this might be
the voice of an angel or even God.
“I
am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.” There's an vital point being
made here. Saul is persecuting Christians, not Christ. But Jesus
doesn't see this as an important distinction. One commentary
speculated that in this exchange we find the seed of Paul's teaching
that we are all members of the body of Christ. Also it is interesting
that the word for “persecute” could also mean “pursue.” Thus
it could be “I am Jesus, whom you are pursuing.” Saul was on a
collision course with Jesus even though he didn't know it.
Then
Jesus tells Saul to go to the city and await instructions. Easier
said than done, since Saul, previously spiritually blind to who Jesus
is, was now physically blind. His traveling companions, who had seen
the light but not Jesus and heard a noise but not a voice, had to
lead Saul by the hand. Meanwhile he had lost not only his sight but
his appetite and thirst as well. It was like he was back in the womb,
not yet ready to enter the new life before him.
Jesus
then contacts a disciple named Ananias and asks him to go to Saul and
heal his sight. Ananias is not wild about this command because Saul's
reputation has preceded him. He had done a lot of harm to Christians
in Jerusalem and his mission to Damascus was well known to the church
here. Is Jesus asking Ananias to walk into a trap?
“Go!”
says Jesus, “for he is my chosen instrument to proclaim my name to
the Gentiles and their kings and to the people of Israel. I will show
him how much he must suffer for my name.” I find it a little
surprising that Jesus shares with Ananias his reasons for sending him
to Saul. He needn't have done that but Jesus is letting him in on how
important both Ananias' and Saul's roles are. And rather than Ananias
suffering at the hands of Saul, Saul will discover what is it like to
become a persecuted Christian.
We
aren't told what Saul was thinking at this time. And I doubt that he
was thinking about his future role in Christianity. I think he was
rethinking his whole concept of God. And I don't think he was
contemplating any future pain he would suffer as a Christian so much
as he was presently undergoing the pain of realizing he was
completely wrong about the very thing he had dedicated his life to.
That would be mortifying for anyone but for an intellectual like
Saul, it must have been excruciating. He had to have known the
arguments the Christians made about Jesus. Now what he thought were
lies turned out to be the truth. What else was he mistaken about?
So
an uncharacteristically quiet Saul fasts in darkness, trying to fit
together what he had learned all his life before with what he now knows.
And then Ananias, once an enemy whom Saul would have arrested, shows
up, addresses Saul as a brother in Christ, and lays hands on him.
God's Spirit heals him and fills him. Immediately Saul is baptized.
Once he is spiritually restored, he begins to eat to restore his
physical strength.
What
Saul did was really tough. But he at least had a face to face
encounter with the risen Christ. People today have to navigate this
change through a spiritual encounter with Jesus instead. It can be
just as profound and life changing but obviously, because we are
physical as well as spiritual beings, we miss the visual and tactile
elements. Also the order of the process is reversed. Saul first faced
Jesus and then had to face himself. Today people first have to face
themselves—their sins, their failures, their imperfections—and
then turn to Jesus for help and healing.
Our
account in Acts omits one part of the story. In Galatians Paul says,
“But when God, who set me apart from my mother's womb and called me
by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might
preach him among the Gentiles, my immediate response was not to
consult any human being. I did not go up to Jerusalem to see those
were apostles before I was, but went into Arabia. Later I returned to
Damascus.” (Galatians 1:15-17) By this, Paul doesn't mean modern
Saudi Arabia but the area to the west of Damascus, which was also called
Nabatea, where they spoke Arabic. We are not sure if he does so
before or after he spends time with the Christians in Damascus as it
says in Acts 9:19. We don't know how long he was there but it looks
as if Saul needed time to work out how Jesus related to the Torah,
the Prophets and the Writings of the Hebrew Bible. I imagine him
living like a monk, surrounded by his scrolls and books, studying and
praying and seeking a new understanding of God.
But
eventually, satisfied that Jesus really is the Messiah foretold in
scripture and that his mission was to save not just Jews but all
humanity through his death on the cross, Saul begins to preach this
in the synagogues. He is a changed man, so much so that eventually he
no longer calls himself Saul, the name of the first king of Israel,
but goes by his Latin name Paul, which means “little.” He is, in his own words, “a new
creation in Christ,” whose old ways of thinking, speaking and
acting are in the past and for whom, everything has become new. (2
Corinthians 5:17)
Making
major changes in your life are hard and so are making changes in
relationships. In our passage from John, Peter and a few of the
Twelve decide to go on a nostalgic fishing trip in Galilee. They
hadn't done it in a while, what with following Jesus all over the landscape.
Little do they know, this is probably their last time at their old
profession.
They
don't have any luck and then someone on shore suggests they cast
their net on the other side of the boat. They do so and soon the net is
bursting with fish. Perhaps recalling the similar incident that
happened early in their time with Jesus, (Luke 5:1-11) the beloved
disciple realizes the man on shore must be Jesus. Impulsive as ever, Peter
leaps into the water and swims to Jesus. After they eat a breakfast
that Jesus has already prepared, Jesus turns to Peter and asks him
something. It must have been awkward. The last time Peter was in the
open air next to a fire, he was in the courtyard of the high priest,
denying 3 times that he knew Jesus.
“Simon,
son of John, do you love me more than these?” A couple of
interesting things to note here. First, Jesus does not use the
nickname he gave the man: Peter, from the Greek for rock. His
declaration that Jesus is the Messiah, the son of the living God, was
the rock-solid foundation on which Jesus would build his church.
Simon has not been so firm and steadfast of late. They are starting
over.
There
are a lot of ways to interpret what Jesus is referring to by the word
“these.” Is he asking Simon if he loves Jesus more than the other
disciples? It's possible since at the last supper when Jesus said
they will all fall away when he is betrayed, Simon said, “Even if
all fall away, I will not.” (Mark 14:29) Simon thought he was more
faithful than the other disciples. He wasn't. But Jesus may have
meant “Do you love me more than these things in your old life, like
fishing?” Because after that first massive haul of fish, Jesus said
to Peter, “From now on you will fish for people.” Right after
that, Peter left his boat and fishing business. Is this fishing
expedition in Galilee a return to things as they were, or is Simon
still willing to follow Jesus' mission?
Simon
replies to Jesus' question, “Yes, Lord: you know I love you.” It
is intriguing that he uses a different word for love than Jesus does.
Greek had many different words that differentiated between familial
love, romantic love, friendship, etc. Jesus uses agapao,
a verb which refers how God loves us, as well as the love God is.
Simon responds with phileo,
the
verb for loving like a friend. Perhaps, in the light of his denials,
Simon is being cautious about making rash claims about the extent of
his devotion.
But
that's OK with Jesus. At the last supper, he called his students his
friends and says, “Greater love has no one than this: that he lay
down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13-15) Friendship was
considered a very strong kind of love. So Jesus just says, “Feed my
lambs.”
Just
when Simon thinks the awkward moment is over, Jesus asks again,
“Simon, son of John, do you love me?” using the word for divine
love and again Simon replies using the word for friendship. Jesus
replies, “Shepherd my sheep.” And when Jesus asks a third time,
“Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter is hurt. And there is something
interesting in the Greek. Jesus uses the same word for friendship as Peter. The effect is of Jesus saying,
“Very well, do you in fact love me as a friend?” Peter, doubtless
on the verge of tears, says, “Lord, you know everything; you know
that I love you.” To which Jesus says one last time, “Feed my
sheep.”
Jesus
addresses the elephant in the room: Peter's 3 denials. He doesn't
pretend it's nothing. It needs to be discussed. Jesus even listens to
what Peter says and modifies his speech to mirror Peter's. Jesus gives him 3 chances to reverse his denials by answering the question of whether he loves him. And Jesus
gives Peter a way to show that love: do what he is supposed to do. Jesus said, "If you love me, you will obey my commandments." (John 14:15) Jesus is not just Peter's friend but his Lord and Peter pledged to
obey him. In fact, at the last supper Peter said he would even follow
Jesus to prison and to death. Here Jesus in effect says, “Yes, you
will.” And Jesus ends with the command, “Follow me.” Whatever
happens, the important thing is to follow Jesus wherever he takes us.
The
two men we discussed become new men after encountering Jesus. Saul
becomes Paul and Simon becomes Peter. Jesus creates a new
relationship with Paul and renews his broken relationship with Peter.
Neither man is perfect but they show they are capable of change for the better. They
do not cling to their problematic pasts but embrace new if uncertain
futures. Because they put their trust in a greater certainty: that
Jesus, who can forgive enemies and flawed friends, will stick with
them through anything they must endure and that it will be worth it
to become the people Jesus saw in them and called them to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment