The
scriptures referred to are Romans 6:12-23.
I
use my Facebook feed at least partly to aggregate and curate news I'm
interested in. As a former Psychiatric and then Neurosurgery nurse, I
am interested in the latest developments in psychology and neurology.
And right now there is a big debate going on in those fields as to whether we have
free will. The key point for those against us having free will is
that in fMRI studies when people are asked to make decisions the
emotional part of the brain reacts a few milliseconds before the
rational part of the brain. The conclusion drawn is that we first go
with our gut and then afterwards rationalize our foregone conclusion.
The study's authors said this shows we don't really make rational
decisions but are slaves to our emotions and reactive and thus do
not have free will. In the comments, I pointed out that if that were
true, the people doing the study had no choice but to say that.
Let's
face it, though: we all do that at times. We make a subconscious emotional
choice and later come up with a rational-sounding justification for
it. And some people seem to do that all the time. But there are times
when we go against our emotional impulses. How else do you explain
martyrs? Nobody's first impulse is to subject themselves to
imprisonment, torture and execution. And we know that when Christianity was illegal in the Roman Empire some church
members did whatever they had to in order to avoid persecution,
including renouncing their faith and making a sacrifice to the
deified emperor. As humiliating as that might have been when fellow
church members heard about it, surely that would be everyone's first
instinct: self-preservation. But some didn't take the easy way out.
They went to their death, deciding that eternal life was more
essential than their earthly life.
And
we see that the same thing happened when plagues hit the Roman
empire. Those who could fled to the countryside. But Christians often
stayed and took care of the sick and dying, at great risk to their
own lives. How was that not a freely made decision?
We
see both of those counterintuitive kinds of decisions today.
Protesters calmly facing heavily armed police. Doctors, nurses and
EMTs deciding to care for COVID-19 patients, despite the fact that
more than 600 healthcare workers have died as a result. If people have no free
will, then you have to posit that some are just hard-wired to put
themselves in harm's way for reasons other than satisfying the basic
needs for food, shelter and sex. You also have to wonder why we urge
people to change their behavior if they have no ability to do other
than what they do. People who want to smoke will smoke. People who
want to drink will drink. People who want to do drugs will do drugs.
Except that many stop, often due to 12 Step programs, which enlist
and bolster the person's decision to stop despite really strong
biochemical reasons not to.
The
Bible calls this impulse to do things that are selfish and
destructive sin. It's not a fashionable word to bandy about these
days but how else does one describe it when a person deliberately
does something they know is wrong or harmful to others? In the book
Explaining Hitler there is a discussion of whether Hitler was
just a true believer, who sincerely believed that Jews were a danger
to the world and that his destroying them was a good thing. Except
that, while he knew about the “Final Solution,” he never verbally
endorsed it, which you would think he would if he thought he was
doing a good thing. After all, he had taken credit for ordering the
killing of the disabled early in his reign. But he got a lot of angry
pushback for it. So he made sure he had plausible deniability when it
came to his genocide of the Jews. Yet he had announced it in Mein
Kampf. Everyone working for him knew he wanted it. He would speak
about it vaguely when meeting with his underlings in private but not
in ways he could be pinned down on later because he knew his
secretaries were preserving his every word for posterity. It was almost like he did want want kudos for this good deed in the future. You even
could argue that one of the reasons the Nazis lost the war was the
massive diversion of personnel, supplies and transport from the war
effort to the concentration camps. Hitler was personally supervising
the war and had to know where his resources were going. These are the
actions of someone who knows he is doing something wrong and is
trying to cover it up in order to get away with it. It was deliberate
and it was sin.
What
the Nazis did was not only deliberate but entirely unnecessary. It
was not their survival that made them decide to wipe out a minority race
and religion. But in some cases people who do bad things do not have
a totally free will, such as those who do things under the influence
of drugs or alcohol or mental illness. Others act in destructive or
self-destructive ways due to trauma, physical or psychological. Most
people addicted to opioids did not start taking them for fun but to
relieve pain. And we know that severe emotional trauma can change the
brain's physical structure and one's reactions to situations. Yet some folks struggling
with these overwhelming negative influences choose to get treatment,
which argues that they still have some ability to make decisions not
based on pure impulse.
In
today's passage from Romans Paul says, “Do not let sin exercise
dominion in your mortal bodies, to make you obey their passions.”
The Greek actually says “Do not let sin reign in your mortal
bodies,” using a verb that also means “to be a king.” Paul may
have been thinking of a contrast with the “kingdom of God,” which
uses the related noun to describe the state in which God reigns in
us. He is saying “Don't let sin rule your lives, making you obey
its desires.” Which recalls the first ever use of the word “sin”
in the Bible. In Genesis, when God is not pleased with Cain's
offering, it says, “Then the Lord said to Cain, 'Why are you angry
and why is your expression downcast? Is it not true that if you do
what is right, you will be fine? But if you do not do what is right,
sin is crouching at the door. It desires to dominate you, but you
must subdue it.'” (Genesis 4:6-7)
It
sounds like “sin” is being personified here. I'm not saying that
is literally true but people who have wrestled with bad habits or
with addictions know that it's like these things have a mind of their
own. In the very next chapter of Romans, Paul speaks the same way
about his struggle with covetousness. “For I would not have known
what coveting really was if the law had not said, 'Do not covet.' But
sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in
me every kind of covetous desire.” (Romans 7:7-8) Later he talks of
how “sin sprang to life and I died.” In this case, Paul is
speaking of a situation where the decision was not only irrational
but the rational part of his brain did not justify it. He speaks of
the 2 parts of him being at war within him and the worst part wins at
times. I think we can all relate.
We
all have what are called besetting sins, our specific Achilles' heel
when it comes to temptation. It may be arrogance or lust or laziness
or greed or rage or envy or gluttony. For instance, gambling may have no allure for
a certain person but junk food does. Another person may not be
addicted to pills but to buying more unnecessary possessions than
they can afford. Some people cannot stay away from pornography while
others are addicted to judging people. And some of them are aware of
this recurring flawed behavior. But they can't seem to get a handle
on it.
Today
all of those behaviors are now thought of as addictions. But that
doesn't mean they are not spiritually damaging
behaviors. The word “addiction” comes from a 16th
century word meaning “devoted to [someone].” Paul uses the
metaphor of being a slave to sin, as he says in verse 17. And when
you find yourself doing again and again something you know is bad for
you or for others, it feels like you are a slave to it. The essence
of slavery is being compelled to do things you'd rather not.
Paul
presents the solution using the same metaphor in a way we would
hesitate to employ today. He says the alternative is to become slaves of
righteousness. Paul says he is "speaking in human term because of your natural limitations." All I can say is that in Paul's day, slavery was not
racially based nor necessarily lifelong. There were worse and better
forms of slavery. Slaves consigned to working in mines or in
gladiatorial combat were basically given a death sentence. On the
other hand, most doctors then were Greek slaves. Many slaves were
educated and household slaves might manage great estates and actually
have more power than most free persons. And in the Roman empire
slaves could work for and achieve their freedom. Which, by the way,
Paul encourages slaves to do. (1 Corinthians 7:21)
My
point is that Paul is using something familiar to his society and
saying, as Bob Dylan pointed out, you gotta serve somebody. Rather
than settle for the kind of slavery whose wages are death, choose the
kind of slavery that leads to freedom. Rather than being devoted to a
thing that will destroy you, be devoted to the God who is love.
The
problem is we can't buy our way out of the slavery into which we've
sold ourselves. We need to be redeemed by someone else. “Redeem”
comes from the Latin “to buy back.” God, who created us in his
image, sent his son to buy us back from our enslavement to sin. He
paid a steep price. He gave his life to give us life.
And
it is ultimately about life. Life gives freedom, whereas death takes
everything away. Living enslaved to sin, to your worst habits and
inclinations, narrows one's life, the way any addiction does. It
becomes a living death. Life in Christ opens up the possibilities.
You can express your devotion to him in so many ways: as a doctor, as
an artist, as a teacher, as a police officer, as a builder, as a
writer, as a scientist, as a coworker, as a musician, as a
veterinarian, as a lawyer, as an ecologist, as a filmmaker, as an
inventor, as a performer, as a nurse, as a manager, as a firefighter,
as a philanthropist, as a public servant, as a neighbor, as a friend,
and even as a clergyperson. You can show God's love and grace in all
you do.
What
Jesus did for us has freed us from the penalty for sin. What the
Spirit is doing in us now is slowly freeing us from the power of sin
in our lives. When we go to be with God we will be freed from the
very presence of sin. Paul expresses this by saying, “Just as you
offered parts of yourselves as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness,
leading to even greater lawlessness, so now offer them as slaves to
righteousness leading to holiness.” (Romans 6:19, my
translation) Slavery to righteousness is like joining a 12 Step
group, or a fitness program. If you follow it conscientiously the
result will be a new and better you.
So
as to the issue of free will we live in a paradox. We don't have
totally free wills, because we are all enslaved to habits of thought
or speaking or acting that are harmful, to ourselves or to others or
to both. Yet the Bible gives us a choice. In fact the whole Bible
would be useless if we did not have the capacity to decide to get
help, to decide not to just go along with our worst urges and
instincts but to try to change. We can respond to the gospel, turn
from sin and return to God. That's really all the word “repent”
means in the original Hebrew: to turn. We have that much free will.
And
science seems to back up the idea that we do have the ability to
choose which way to turn. Literally. At Rockefeller University
researchers exposed microscopic roundworms to the odor of food while
monitoring their brains. Usually they turned and moved toward the
odor but some didn't, though they could tell their brains had
registered the odor. They actually seemed to think about whether they
should go towards the food or just continue exploring. Round worms
have only 302 neurons and about 7000 synapses, compared to the human
complement of 86 billion neurons and 100 trillion synapses. If God
lets the roundworm have a certain amount of free will, then surely we
humans are not mere puppets of our biology and emotions and
environment.
We
can decide to follow Jesus rather than our sinful impulses and
thoughts. But it is not just a one time deal. Jesus said, “If
anyone wants to become my follower, he must deny himself, take up his
cross daily, and follow me.” (Luke 9:23, my emphasis)
As the 12 Step programs, which owe a lot to Christianity, say we need to take things “one
day at a time” because they recognize that it is a commitment that
must be continually renewed. And also, the prospect of making such a
drastic change forever frightens people. They think, “I'll never
make it that long!” The book of Hebrews says, “But exhort one
another each day, as long as it is called 'Today,' that none of you
may become hardened by sin's deception.” (Hebrews 3:13) That
deception is that you can't change, not really, not for long. That
deception is that you will be back where you were, trapped in your
bad habits, in your self-destructive thinking, unable to do anything
to stop it. That deception is that the future is fixed, immutable,
and you are doomed to repeat yourself. That deception leads to
despair, to giving up, to giving in to your worst thoughts, words and
actions. It says you're hopeless.
But
God says that your past, and even your present, need not determine
your future. You can decide to turn to God. Every second you are
alive is a second chance to choose eternal life. Put your trust in
God, pin your hope on him, and he can change you. Someone once
summarized the first 3 steps of the 12 Step program as "I can't, God
can, and I'm going to let him."
That
doesn't mean it will be easy or painless. After my accident, the road
to recovery was long, difficult and painful. But eventually I did see
progress. Because I believed my therapists that this was possible and
worked with them to make it so. And 4 ½ months after I broke both
legs, among other things, I walked—using parallel bars and being
tightly held by the therapist, gripping my therapy belt. But I
walked. And with their help, I got better at it.
Which
reflects the paradox of us having free will but not entirely. Or as
Paul put it, “...continue to work out your salvation with fear and
trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and to act
according to his good purpose.” (Philippians 2:12-13) C.S. Lewis
pointed out the first half of that verse makes it sound like it's all
on us but the second half makes it sound like it all depends on God.
Like all paradoxes, it preserves a complex truth. To say we can
follow Jesus on our own efforts alone is arrogance. To say we can just
sit back and let God do it all is abdication of our responsibility.
It
starts with saying “Yes” to God. It means being devoted to him
and doing what he says. It means when things get hard, remembering
what a father said when he brought his sick boy to Jesus to be
healed. Jesus said, “Everything is possible for him who believes.”
To which the father said, “I do believe; help my unbelief!” (Mark
9:23-24) He could and he couldn't. But that was enough for Jesus to
work with and heal the boy. We too can do all things through Christ
who strengthens us. (Philippians 4:13) Just ask...and dare!
No comments:
Post a Comment