The
scriptures referred to are Exodus 34:29-35 and 2 Corinthians
3:12-4:2.
Somewhere
there is probably a commentary on the Revised Common Lectionary
written by someone on the committee that compiled it. And I hope that
somewhere it explains the quizzical way they picked the beginnings
and endings of the passages we read each week. Context is important
in understanding anything and especially when trying to understand
the Bible. So I wonder why sometimes the readings don't
start one verse earlier or end one verse later in instances where it
would greatly help us know what we are discussing. Otherwise it is the job
of the preacher to spend a chunk of his or her sermon reading aloud
as well as explicating the verses not included.
In
our New Testament lesson we are plunked into the midst of Paul's
comparison of the old and new covenants. Were I the editor of the
lectionary I would have included most if not all of the paragraph
preceding our reading in 2 Corinthians. Paul is referring to our
passage in Exodus about how Moses' face glowed after he talked to the
Lord and how it unnerved the people of Israel. The point he is making
is that even so, the glory accompanying the giving of the old
covenant eventually faded. And so he says in verse 11: “And if what
was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that
which lasts!”
That
is the hope to which he points in verse 12—the glorious and
everlasting nature of the new covenant. Unlike the old one it is not
going away. The Jews already had to accommodate the fact that parts
of the old covenant could become irrelevant. When they were taken
into exile in Babylon, the many parts of the Law that dealt with the
temple and the priesthood were inactive because the temple had been
destroyed. That led to rabbinic Judaism, and the religion came to
focus on the Torah and obeying the rest of the Law. That's the form
of Judaism we have today, because there is no temple and thus no
sacrificial system. In Jesus' day the temple was back in action but
the parts of the Law dealing with the king were invalid because there
was no Jewish king, just a Gentile emperor.
Not
only did parts of the Law become inapplicable because of things that
no longer exist, but provisions had to be made to deal with stuff
which had come into being since Moses presented the Law. So the
scribes and Pharisees formulated what came to be called the Oral Law.
These were ways in which the Mosaic Law was extended and adapted to
things not covered by it. And it came to be considered as binding as
the Written Law. For instance, one could not work on the Sabbath but
what constituted work? The rabbis eventually came up with 39
categories of work. Was tearing a piece of paper work? Yes, because
it is too close to cutting something to a shape. What about
separating good fruit from bad? Yes, because it is a form of
winnowing, selecting and sifting. Today rabbinic law forbids flipping
a light switch on the Sabbath because it is essentially kindling a
fire. And you can't even touch electronics on the Sabbath. As culture
changes and technology develops so have the prohibitions. The Oral
Law is a tacit admission that parts of the Mosaic Law would otherwise
have become outdated.
Now
some of these are considered hedges around the Torah, rules that stop
you at a point so early that you won't even get close to violating
the actual commandment. It's like an alcoholic deciding to not even
go to restaurants with bars, so to avoid temptation. Still in
some cases these hedges around the Torah smack of putting a safety
fence a good mile from the lip of the Grand Canyon just to make sure
no tourist falls in.
Rabbis
even designate some of the commandments as chukim,
decrees that are observed even though there is no obvious explanation
for them. This would include the prohibition against making clothing
that mixed linen and wool or against boiling a kid in its mother's
milk. In fact, some rabbis admit that there are no logical reasons
for the dietary laws. They simply obey them because they are part of
the Torah. Rabbis contrast these with mishpatim,
laws that make sense, like prohibiting murder or bribery.
The
new covenant inaugurated by Jesus is not about ceremonial rituals or
Bronze Age governmental regulations or dietary laws. It is not about
the 5 different kinds of sacrificial offerings and which is
appropriate for which occasion. Jesus' sacrifice took place once and
for all and his covenant is about the ethical implications of that
for those who follow him. Jesus did what he did out of love and he
said the commands to love God and love one another supersede all
other laws. The other commandments derive from these two and no other
law is greater than they are. (Matthew 22:40; Mark 12:31)
There
is another way in which the new covenant is different than the old.
Of the 613 commandments in the Torah, 248 were positive but 365 were
negative. So nearly 60% of the old covenant was about restrictions,
what you shouldn't do. The commandments to love which Jesus
prioritizes are positive. Obviously you don't do certain things to
those you love because they harm or betray them. But love more often
impels you to find ways to help and enhance the well-being of the
beloved. When you are in love you find yourself doing things you
would not ordinarily have done, like changing diapers and going to
events you normally wouldn't attend. You find yourself taking an
interest in the things your beloved does. Love expands what you do
and what you pay attention to.
So
the old covenant constricts your actions while the new covenant
expands them. But that depends on whether you are limited by words
written long ago or by the Living Word of God, our Lord Jesus. Rabbis
realized that without extending the range of the old covenant through
the Oral Law it becomes irrelevant. Under the new covenant what
guides us is the Spirit of our Lord. And because he is God and God is
love, love expands the circle of who we care about as well as the
range of what we do. And because we have more options, as Paul puts
it, “where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”
That
greater freedom under the new covenant is seen as soon as Jesus
begins his ministry. First off, Jesus heals on the Sabbath which the
scribes and Pharisees see as a violation of the Law. (Matthew
12:11-13) And it does violate the Oral Law, that is, the traditional
interpretation of the law, but it does not break the letter of the
written law, and is in perfect alignment with the Spirit of the law.
When Jesus touched a leper to heal him (Matthew 8:2-3; cf. Leviticus
13:45-46) or touched a dead body (Luke 7:11-17) or let himself be touched by the
woman with the hemorrhage (Matthew 9:18-25), that would make him
ceremonially unclean, yet he didn't go through the period of
isolation and ritual to cleanse himself. Imagine how few people he
could heal if he did that after every one. Jesus told a man whom he
healed on the Sabbath to pick up his bedding and go, though this was
considered work. (John 5:8-15) He taught women (Luke 8:1-3; 10:38-42)
and though this was not forbidden in the Old Testament, in the
Jerusalem Talmud, a compendium of the Oral Law, Rabbi Eliezer says,
“The words of the Torah should burn rather than be taught to a
woman.” So Jesus was certainly violating the orthodox
interpretations of the Law.
But
Jesus is just recognizing a hierarchy of values that flow from the
two greatest commandments. Love impels you to heal and help others
even when it goes against rules and traditions created by human
beings. This is the same ethical thinking that led certain Catholics
and Protestants in Nazi-occupied Europe to hide Jews, and to forge
ration cards for them and to lie to the authorities, all in order to
save lives.
We
see this from the beginning of the church. It was the Spirit of the
Lord who led Philip to preach to and baptize the Ethiopian eunuch
(Acts 8;26-39), though in the Torah says that such a man could not be
a part of the people of God. (Deuteronomy 23:1) The problem of who
could join God's people arose again and again. Though God poured out
his Spirit on Gentiles like Cornelius and his family and on the
Godfearers who came to Jesus through Paul's preaching, there were
those who felt that only Gentiles who first converted to Judaism and
were circumcised could be Christians. (Acts 15) But the church used
the authority granted it by Jesus to decide who can be part of the
people of God. In Matthew Jesus talks about church discipline and
says “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in
heaven and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
Again, truly I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about
anything they ask for, it will be done for them by my Father in
heaven. For where two or three gather in my name, there I am with
them.” (Matthew 18:18-20) And in John the risen Jesus says,
“Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone's sins, their sins
are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
(John 20:22-23)
One
way of looking at the structure of the Bible is like an hourglass.
The Old Testament is like a funnel. It starts with the creation of
the whole world and all humanity and gradually the focus narrows to
the descendants of Abraham, and specifically his descendants through
Isaac, and Isaac's descendants through Jacob, and Jacob's descendants
through Judah, and Judah's descendants through Jesse, and Jesse's
descendants through David. The New Testament reverses this, beginning
with one descendant of David, Jesus, and then widens the focus to the
disciples, and then to the converts at Pentecost, and then to the
scattered believers, and then to house churches spreading through the
empire, and then to the Gentiles and concludes in Revelation with
believers from every tongue and nation living with God in a new earth
that is part of the new creation. God created the world and wants to
restore it and everyone on it.
Not
everyone will respond to his call. But some do who might otherwise
give us pause, who are the modern day equivalent of the person who is
a eunuch, or who is a leper, or who falls in some other category that
would be excluded under the old covenant. The problem is: do we
exclude such people over an identity or over circumstances which are
beyond their control? Paul says no. “There is neither Jew nor
Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ
Jesus.” (Galatians 3:28)
As
we have seen, the new covenant, the covenant of God's love in Christ,
is about an expansion of who can become part of the kingdom of God.
Jesus ate with disreputable people and when asked why he did that he
replied, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I
have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance.”
(Luke 5:31-32) And we are all sinners. Everybody in this room,
including the guy in the collar, is a sinner. And so is every mere
human in the Bible we think of as heroes of the faith. Noah got
drunk; Jacob was a conman; Moses was a fugitive from justice; David
committed adultery and murder; Rahab was a prostitute; Jonah ran from
God; the Samaritan woman was divorced 5 times; Peter denied Jesus 3
times. God calls and redeems and uses imperfect people. No sin is a
deal breaker. No condition is a barrier God cannot overcome. Nothing
that deviates from the norm can make us unlovable to the God who is
love. As Paul said, “...we have this treasure in jars of clay to
show that this all-surpassing power is from God and not from us.”
(2 Corinthians 4:7)
As
Anne Lamott says, God loves us just the way we are but he loves us
too much to let us stay where we are. Yes, the idea is that we will
change and get better but it doesn't happen right away or overnight.
As Paul says, “And all of us, with unveiled faces, seeing the glory
of the Lord as though reflected in a mirror, are being transformed
into the same image from one degree of glory to another; for this
comes from the Lord, the Spirit.” We are meant to reflect the glory
of Christ in our lives. But when we look in the mirror of our soul we
don't see it all at once. We are supposed to become more Christlike
but it happens by degrees as Paul says. It is a process. And it's a
mirror. We are supposed to be looking at our own progress, not anyone
else's.
It
is by God's mercy, Paul says, that he and his colleagues were engaged
in their ministry. It is by God's mercy that any of us are engaged in
serving God in any capacity. He is gracious. "So we do not lose heart." We may not be perfect but we should see some changes. God's Spirit is
in us and, if we let him, he is working on us. It's like when I was
in rehab after my accident. The therapists and I were happy with any
progress but we did not rest on our laurels. We kept pushing forward,
trying to do a little bit better each day. Sometime I hit a plateau
and I thought, “Is this it? Will it get no better than this?” But
eventually, with their help, I would progress further. It was slow
and sometimes painful. But I never forgot my goal: to walk again. And
we should never forget our goal: to walk in love, just as Christ
loved us and gave himself up for us. (Ephesians 5:2)
The
old covenant commemorates God letting death pass over his people and
his liberating them from slavery in Egypt. The new covenant is about
Jesus undergoing death in our place so that he might liberate us from slavery to sin and the spiritual death that follows. It is not about
inexplicable rules but a way of life that makes sense in the light of
God's love and grace revealed in Jesus' life, death and resurrection.
And it is abundant life; it is love running over, ever expanding the
circle of who is included.
In
Genesis, God makes a new world and new creatures in his divine image. In
Isaiah God says, “Behold, I am doing a new thing!” (Isaiah 43:19)
In Revelation, he says, “Behold, I am making everything new!”
(Revelation 21:5) But new things often bother or even scare us. We
are content with the familiar, even if it is not good. And often
religious people are the most resistant to what is new. We try to
rein in the Spirit and tell him he can only do more of the old stuff.
Yet we are told that “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation;
the old has passed away; behold, all things have become new.” (2
Corinthians 5:17) How can we be new creations and not do new things?
Living
things do not remain static. God is living and while he does not
change in his essential character, the way he expresses his nature of
love and justice and forgiveness and grace does. When he expressed
himself in Jesus, the Living Word of God made flesh, that was new.
When he, our lawgiver and judge, took it upon himself to die in our
place for our sins, that was new. When he rose from the dead, that
was new. When he poured out his Spirit on his people to carry on the
mission of spreading the good news of Jesus to the whole world, that
was new. God is doing new things all the time. We need to be open to
what he is doing in the world around us. We need to trust him and to
operate in the freedom he grants us. Just because something is
unprecedented doesn't mean it's not from God. When our extraordinary,
revolutionary, groundbreaking, unstoppable God is at work, expect the
unexpected!
No comments:
Post a Comment