The scriptures referred
to are 1 Corinthians 8:1-13.
You
may find this hard to believe but some people think I'm a
know-it-all. (Wait for inevitable laughs) Yeah, I find it funny, too. At best, I am a
know-a-lot. And that's limited to subjects that I am interested in.
My family learned a long time ago that if they wanted to keep me from
winning Trivial Pursuit keep asking me sports questions. I know
virtually nothing about sports outside of the names of athletes whose
scandals enter the mainstream news. There are types of music I don't
know much about. And I love meeting people who have worked in uncommon
jobs and learning about whole realms I never knew existed. Believe it
or not, when I find myself in conversation with an expert in
something, I tend to shut up and listen to what they can teach me. I
subscribe to what Will Rogers observed when he said, “We are all
ignorant, just on different things.”
In
today's New Testament reading Paul says, “Knowledge puffs up but
love builds up.” Paul was a rabbi and very knowledgeable about the
Bible. He also was fairly well informed about pagan culture, quoting
Greek playwrights and referencing boxing and other sports. He took
books with him on his journeys. So it is a bit surprising that such
an intellectual man could say that knowledge inflates one's pride
while in contrast love builds people up. That insight underlies this
whole passage.
Again
you will notice quotation marks in the passage which indicate the parts of the
letter from the Corinthians that Paul is referring to. The question
is whether a Christian can, in good conscience, eat meat that had
been previously sacrificed to idols. The reason this was even a
problem is that most meat markets were attached to pagan temples.
Excess meat sacrificed to the idols was sold to the public. Some
Christians had no problem with this because “no idol in the world
really exists” and “there is no God but one.” In other words,
to some Christians the meat may as well have been offered to the
tooth fairy as an idol of marble or gold. It was just as unreal. But
the consciences of some Christians were no so easily assuaged. We do
not know if their primary objection was that the idols were real or
just thought it looked bad for Christians to eat the leftover
sacrifices from pagan gods. But going against their consciences made
them feel that they were betraying their faith. Paul says their
consciences were weak. The Greek word used here basically means
“strengthless.” It could also be translated “feeble, sickly,
impotent.” So Paul told the Christians with such feeble consciences
to grow up, grow a pair and stop whining!
No, he
didn't. Instead he told those who had more robust consciences to make
allowances for their weaker siblings in Christ. Paul is saying,
“Yeah, you are more knowledgeable. But don't let your knowledge
make you arrogant and callous. Rather out of Christian love, limit
your own freedom in Christ.”
Wait!
Paul, the foremost advocate of Christian liberty, is saying to
instead tailor your freedom to accommodate those with more feeble
consciences? Why? Because of the primacy of love. If you walk with a
small child you don't take your full stride. You deliberately limit
your freedom to walk at your normal speed out of deference for
someone smaller and unable to keep up. You do so out of concern and
compassion for the child. Paul is basically saying that if you are
dealing with someone whose conscience is not as strong as yours, you
need to accommodate them as you would a child.
This
goes contrary to the way the world looks at strength. In this
world, if you are strong others either defer to you as a matter of
course or you bend them to your will. In the old days it was the
physically strong who ruled and most great kings were great warriors.
But under the right circumstances a strong mind could defeat a strong
body. The Bible tells us that David was not a tall man but he was a
master strategist. How do you fight someone bigger and stronger than
you? You stand at a distance and hurl a stone into his forehead.
Then, when he's down, you chop off his head. Brains versus brawn.
There
are other sources of strength, though. With agriculture came the
accumulation of valuable things, like food and livestock. When money
was invented as a medium of exchange, having a lot of money gave you
a lot of power. That in turn allowed you to hire lots of people and
become a powerful force in your community. It also allowed you to
bribe judges which gave you power in legal matters and allowed you to
bribe other officials which gave you political power. And if you
combined political, financial and military power, you could pretty
much do whatever you wished. And powerful people usually do.
For
instance, powerful people do occasionally murder spouses or other
individuals in rage. But I cannot remember a single one winding up on
death row, much less being executed. If I stole a ring from you I
would be in hot water legally. Vladimir Putin, upon meeting New
England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, admired his Super Bowl ring.
Kraft took it off and showed it to Putin. Saying, “I could kill
someone with that ring,” Putin pocketed the $25,000 diamond ring
and left. When Kraft asked for it back, Putin claims he remembered
neither Kraft nor the ring—which, by the way, is on display as a
gift to the Kremlin. Were I to defraud you of a few thousand dollars
and be caught and found guilty by officials, I would probably get
jail time. JPMorgan Chase was fined $20 billion dollars for its
financial wrongdoings and not only did no one go to jail but the same
year, it increased the $11.5 million it paid its CEO Jamie Dimon by a
few more millions.
People
with power can do a lot of things. They rarely ask themselves if they
should do them. And they primarily use their power for their own
benefit. They rarely see their power as a resource for the use of
others, as a stewardship from God to be shared generously with the
poor and powerless. When they do, it is news. Sadly it is much easier
to find news of the outrages above than news of people such as Tom
White, a Christian and a construction company owner, who decided to
give away his fortune before he died. It's a goal he reached at age
84, having given $75 million dollars to more than 100 charities,
especially Dr. Paul Farmer's work in Haiti.
Power
seeks to justify itself. It rarely says, “I am a fluke,” but
almost always “I am deserved.” Which means that those who are on
the opposite end of the spectrum apparently deserve to be powerless.
Thus we have the pernicious idea that anyone can be rich if they work
hard enough. If hard work were enough to make you wealthy then the
hotel maids and restaurant waitstaff and floor nurses and elementary
teachers of this world would be in the top 1%. Hard work is only one
factor in achieving power.
I was
watching the PBS series on the Roosevelts and was once again very
impressed by Teddy, our 26th president. One historian said
he was a genius, reading a book a day, 3 if he had the time. He wrote
over 150,000 letters during his 2 terms, dictating them to a
succession of secretaries, one picking up when another was exhausted.
We like to think that Teddy marched into the presidency based on his
merits alone. But Theodore was the child of a wealthy family. He was home
schooled by tutors. He went to Harvard. He received help from family
and influential friends. If you took away that privilege, do you
think this sickly child who had multiple near fatal bouts of asthma
would have achieved as much? And what if he were not white? Or not
male? The prospects for such a person in the late 1800s were not
good.
But
what Theodore Roosevelt did with his strengths marked him as a very
unusual man of power. He fought corruption in government and in the
New York police department. He fought corporate greed. A month into
his presidency he invited Booker T. Washington to dine with him, his
wife and his daughter in the White House despite a storm of protests
from southerners. He insisted labor be represented in arbitration to
end a coal mine strike. He convened the first White House Conference
on the Care of Dependent Children. He used his strength to help the
weak.
Perhaps
Roosevelt picked this up from his regular attendance of his Dutch
Reformed Church or his wife's Episcopal Church. I do know that when
something he proposed was criticized as not being within his
constitutional powers, Teddy paraphrased Jesus and said, “The
constitution was made for the people, not the people for the
constitution.”
In the
musical Camelot, King Arthur is trying to make his realm a
better one. He realizes that the world thinks might makes right.
Whatever strong men want, they make it so by power. Arthur's
revolutionary idea is “Might FOR Right.” In other words, his
knights will use their prowess with the sword to bring about, not
their own wills, but what is right. It's not quite a Christian idea
because physical coercion is involved but certainly the Bible makes
clear that God gives us various gifts to use for the good of all the
people. To those he gives power, he does so not that they might get
their own way but that they might help those who have little or no
power. God has nothing against those who are rich, provided they came
by their wealth honestly and they are generous to the poor. In the
same way, the strong are supposed to help the weak. And the same
principle applies to those with stronger consciences.
What
does Paul mean by a strong conscience? For Paul the conscience is
like an internal tribunal that judges whether our thoughts, words and
deeds match our moral standards. A good or strong conscience helps
one bring them into harmony. A weak conscience, which he also
describes as “defiled” (1 Cor 8:7), is one that doesn't function
so well when it comes to maintaining one's integrity. It allows one
to go against the very standards one supposedly agrees with. Such a
weak conscience can be “wounded” (8:12) and it can cause the
person to “stumble” (8:13) and be spiritually “destroyed.”
(8:11) The person with the strong conscience wants to make sure he
isn't the cause of a person going against their conscience and so,
out of love, abstains from behavior that might tempt someone to
compromise their integrity.
Notice
that we are not talking about areas in which the Bible is clear but
rather specific instances where Christians legitimately have
different views. Paul is not saying that everyone has to think alike
in such matters. In 1 Corinthians 10:29, Paul says “why should my
freedom be judged by another's conscience?” As he writes in Romans
14:5, regarding the differences Christians were having over which, if
any, holy days to observe, “Each person must be fully convinced in
his own mind.” This is freedom in Christ: not that anything goes in
every matter but that in nonessential matters, one is free to make up
one's mind so long as one is fully convinced.
So how
does this relate to us today? There are a lot of issues confronting
the Church on which Scripture is either silent or ambiguous.
Christians of good conscience have come to different conclusions and
some Christians are still wrestling with these controversies. Paul
would say “Each person must be fully convinced in his own mind.”
But he would also tell those who are convinced, whichever side they
are on, to have consideration for those who are still struggling.
Don't bully them and try to force them to do something they are not
fully convinced is the right thing. No one should feel compelled to
do something ethically that they are having grave doubts about.
How
does one decide on such issues? The first step is to study Scripture.
Even if the matter is not directly addressed, it is good to know what
the Bible says about analogous topics or related issues and see if
there are some principles that can be derived from them. A broad and
deep knowledge of the Bible is always a good place to start.
The
second step is to look at what Christians have done about the issue
in the past. Were these rooted in Scriptural principles? Which ones?
What other reasons did they appeal to? And what did Christians on the
other side say? A good knowledge of church history helps us realize
that we are not necessarily the first to deal with a problem and it
helps us to learn from how our predecessors dealt with it.
The
third step is to use reason, remembering that reason is not a
position in and of itself but rather a method for teasing out the
implications of certain principles or data and trying to remain
self-consistent. Two people can be totally logical and come up with
opposite positions because they started with different premises. As
Christians we start with the revelation of God in Scripture. Still
scripture encompasses a awful lot and what one chooses to emphasize
can lead believers to differ. So our emphasis has to be rooted in
God's living Word, Jesus Christ. All Scripture must be seen through
the lens of what we see of God in the teachings, acts, death and
resurrection of Jesus. For instance, if we are looking at something
in the Old Testament that seems pretty harsh we must nevertheless
remember that Jesus said all of the Law and the prophets are
dependent on the two greatest commandments to love God and love our
neighbor and that none of the commandments are greater than those 2.
So our response in any situation must be a loving one, even if we
disagree on the specific way in which we express that love.
And
even though Paul says we can't bully those with weak consciences, it
doesn't mean we can't talk about such matters. We can help people who
are struggling clarify what issues they are wrestling with and share
our struggles and what helped convince us. We should listen to them.
We can also share our questions and insights and even doubts. That's
scary because it reveals our vulnerability. But true strength is
daring to show your vulnerability and admitting your own imperfection
to another. Those who act as if they have no questions and no doubts
but are 100% certain are often not the strongest people but the most
insecure. It's a mask to fool others. But we don't live in a comic
book world and can only help others and help ourselves when we remove
the mask of pretending to be perfect.
And
then we need to give our so-called weak brothers and sisters in
Christ the freedom to decide for themselves and to realize that we
are not to pass judgment on them anymore than they are to pass
judgment on us. And we should be humble, realizing that we don't know
it all and are in all probability not correct in everything we
believe. Remember, knowledge puffs up but love builds up.
Jesus
did not say, “The world will know you are my disciples by the way
you agree on everything.” Rather the sign of discipleship is our
love for one another. And in this fractious world what better
testimony can we offer the world than being able to disagree with our
fellow Christians on some issues and yet still worship together and
work together on those things which Jesus made clear he expects of
us: to love others, to forgive their wrongs, to admit our wrongs and
to use our strengths not to take advantage of the weak but to help
them and to encourage them to grow and become stronger in faith, hope
and love?